Even though we briefly brought the topic up a week ago
or so, the idea that Stephen seems to revert, in a way, to childhood again
after becoming a devout Catholic intrigues me. It seems mildly ironic in a
sense, that Stephen makes a decision of his own (which was a sign of him
growing and becoming independent) to become the most devout Catholic the world
has ever seen. In every sense, the decision Stephen made was one of spiritual
growth. However, as he became more of a spiritual man, he seemed to lose his
grip on the world around him, almost as if he forgets some of his worldly
wisdom. He doesn’t care about his surroundings and what sort of beauty he can
find in it as much as he used to. In addition, his language becomes simpler and
he doesn’t go off on the trademark tangents that Stephen was so fond of making.
In fact, it is very reminiscent of Stephen’s mind as a child at Clongowes.
At
Clongowes, Stephen was an innocent, simpler minded version of himself. He was
very focused on doing whatever the “right thing” was, even though he might not
know exactly why it was the right thing. A sort of faith in his decisions that
they were the correct thing to do. It is almost exactly the same sort of
behavior that Stephen exhibits when he decides to embrace Catholicism. A core
aspect of Christianity in general is faith, the ability to trust in something
you can’t see and don’t necessarily understand. Normally, this is trusting that
God will get you out of a situation or put you in one, all you need to do is
the “right thing”. Rarely is that even close to obvious, and oddly enough,
Stephen’s younger self had just about as much knowledge on what the “right
thing” or “right answer” was as any sort of faith decision: little to no clue.
Also, possibly a coincidence, but the few times Stephen mentions that he knows
the “right answer” as a child, he said he knew that because of his father and quite
often God is referred to as Father and humans as the children. Aside from a
faith in actions comparison, Stephen as a devout Catholic makes the conscious
effort to be as pure and correct a person as he can be, which younger Stephen
can easily be seen as a very innocent and mostly pure child. In the end, it’s
almost as if Stephen has not only reverted to his younger self, but also fully
embraced some of the aspects of his life that he intentionally threw away, like
his innocence. Progress spiritually actually appeared to set back Stephen from
maturing more in a worldly sense.
I agree that Stephen's development in the Church is sets back his personal development. However, I associate it with his high degree of obedience. When Stephen goes back to the church, he obsessively follows the rules, but has very little soul. It is all ritual. It goes along the same lines as when Stephen understands the most arcane teachings of the Church but doesn't understand the basic fundamental that God loves him. I agree that Stephen's attachment to the Church is at odds with his personal maturation, but I think it is his obsession to follow the rules which impedes his progress.
ReplyDeleteI think this is a really interesting and important idea and I think that that this is part of the reason that Stephen must throw the church away before he finally matures/he matures by turning his back on the church. I think that while many people can mature while following religion, Stephen because he follows whatever he is doing so absolutely is unable to combine the two, because becoming mature is in many ways losing your innocence and to follow Christianity as Stephen believes it he can't lose any innocence.
ReplyDelete